Search references for WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION. Phrases containing WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
See searches and references containing WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION!WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
1990 federal antitrust suit
Wilk v. American Medical Association, 895 F.2d 352 (7th Cir. 1990), was a federal antitrust suit brought against the American Medical Association (AMA)
Wilk v. American Medical Association
Wilk_v._American_Medical_Association
Alleged conspiracy by GM and others to replace streetcar lines with buses
system with a similar proposal. The UCMT was censured by the American Transit Association and dissolved in 1935. The New York Railways Corporation began
General Motors streetcar conspiracy
General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy
2021 United States Supreme Court case
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, 594 U.S. 69 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the compensation of collegiate
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston
National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association_v._Alston
Lawsuit by Epic Games against Google
Epic Games v. Google, 147 F.4th 917 (9th Cir. 2025), later known as In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, was a ruling of the United States Court
Epic_Games_v._Google
2001 American antitrust law case
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.
2015 US federal appeals court case
O'Bannon v. NCAA, 802 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2015), was an antitrust class action lawsuit filed against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)
O'Bannon_v._NCAA
American legal case
Robertson v. National Basketball Association, 556 F.2d 682 (2d Cir. 1977), was an antitrust lawsuit filed by American basketball player Oscar Robertson
Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n
Robertson_v._National_Basketball_Ass'n
2020 U.S. lawsuit
deemed acceptable in practice in the 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case Ohio v. American Express Co. as long as no harm was shown to either side of the two-sided
Epic_Games_v._Apple
Antitrust case alleging domination of advertising
United States v. Google LLC is a federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC on January 24, 2023
United States v. Google LLC (2023)
United_States_v._Google_LLC_(2023)
2010 antitrust action
District of Columbia alleging violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al., the Department of Justice alleged that Adobe
High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation
1964 US legal case
Surgeons v. California Medical Association, 224 Cal. App. 2d 378 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1964) was a legal case between two medical associations in the state
Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons v. California Medical Ass'n
Osteopathic_Physicians_&_Surgeons_v._California_Medical_Ass'n
Companies descended from Standard Oil
Oil by the ruling in U.S. v. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, as listed in Section 4 of the court's judgement. Anglo-American Oil Company Atlantic Refining
Successors_of_Standard_Oil
Type of legal settlement
this limited flexibility of consent decrees in United States v. Terminal Railroad Association: "[A] decree will not be expanded by implication or intendment
Consent_decree
United States ongoing antitrust court case
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook, Inc.) is an antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade
FTC_v._Meta
American legal system intended to promote competition among businesses
Sherman Act section 1. Wilk v. American Medical Association, 895 F.2d 352 (7th Cir. 1990) the American Medical Association's boycott of chiropractors
United_States_antitrust_law
1911 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. American Tobacco Company, 221 U.S. 106 (1911), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that the combination
United States v. American Tobacco Co.
United_States_v._American_Tobacco_Co.
1890 U.S. anti-monopoly law
settled in 1982 and resulted in the breakup of the company. Wilk v. American Medical Association (1990) Judge Getzendanner issued her opinion that the AMA
Sherman_Antitrust_Act
1982 US government action ending telephone monopoly
Court for the District of Columbia (February 28, 1983). "United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983)". Temin, Peter (April
Breakup_of_the_Bell_System
2024 American court case
United States, et al. v. Apple Inc. is a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. in 2024. The United States Department
United_States_v._Apple_(2024)
Ongoing American antitrust lawsuit
United States, et al. v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster Entertainment, LLC is an antitrust lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of
United States v. Live Nation Entertainment
United_States_v._Live_Nation_Entertainment
Antitrust case alleging domination of internet search
United States v. Google LLC is an ongoing federal antitrust case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) against Google LLC, initiated
United States v. Google LLC (2020)
United_States_v._Google_LLC_(2020)
1911 U.S. Supreme Court case
act of 1890... [... Harlan J quoted from United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897) and continued...] I have made these
Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
Standard_Oil_Co._of_New_Jersey_v._United_States
United States government agency
successfully challenged in court the $195 million acquisition of Palmyra Medical Center by Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital. The FTC alleged that the transaction
Federal_Trade_Commission
1982 case in U.S. antitrust law
Judgement (archived scan) in United States of America v. Western Electric Company, Incorporated, and American Telephone and Telegraph Company. United States
United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)
1948 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on monopolistic practices by the film industry
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948) (also known as the Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948, the Paramount Case, or the Paramount
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc.
2023 lawsuit brought against the multinational technology company Amazon
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc. is a lawsuit brought against the multinational technology company and online retailer Amazon in 2023
FTC_v._Amazon
Lawsuit over real estate commission fees
Burnett v. National Association of Realtors (formerly Sitzer v. National Association of Realtors) is a class-action lawsuit challenging the fees charged
Burnett v. National Association of Realtors
Burnett_v._National_Association_of_Realtors
2010 United States Supreme Court case
American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 560 U.S. 183 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the ability of teams in the National
American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League
American_Needle,_Inc._v._National_Football_League
American court case
Federal Trade Commission v. Microsoft Corp. and Activision Blizzard, Inc. was a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Microsoft
FTC_v._Microsoft
1914 US law establishing the Federal Trade Commission
manufacturers from joining price-fixing cartels. After Northern Securities Co. v. United States, a 1904 case that dismantled a J. P. Morgan company, antitrust
Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914
Federal_Trade_Commission_Act_of_1914
Doctrine of US antitrust and criminal law
market; the FTC investigated the trade association defendant for the same practices, sued it, and the association accepted a consent decree, but the court
Hub-and-spoke_conspiracy
1922 United States Supreme Court case
Browns of the American League. The owner of the Baltimore Terrapins had not been compensated, and sued the National League, the American League and other
Federal Baseball Club v. National League
Federal_Baseball_Club_v._National_League
1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision on baseball antitrust exemption
In 1883, the American Association entered into the first national agreement with the NL, extending the reserve system to the Association as well. In 1903
Flood_v._Kuhn
American academic and political movement
figure Louis Brandeis. During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, the American economy underwent a period of corporate consolidation, finding itself at
New_Brandeis_movement
Contemporary Problems. 6 (1). JSTOR: 91–110. doi:10.2307/1189730. JSTOR 1189730. "The Wheeler-Lea Act". Federal Trade Commission. 26 June 2015. v t e
Wheeler–Lea_Act
2007 United States Supreme Court case
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly
US federal law
The American Economic Review. 48 (1): 92–104. ISSN 0002-8282. Mason, Alpheus T. (August 1924). "The Labor Clauses of the Clayton Act". American Political
Clayton_Antitrust_Act_of_1914
1957 United States Supreme Court case
Mackey v. NFL. This money would be distributed among some 3,200 active and former players ... In return, the National Football League Players Association accepted
Radovich v. National Football League
Radovich_v._National_Football_League
leading firms in major sectors: Standard Oil; American Tobacco; United States Steel; Aluminum Company of America; International Harvester; National Cash Register;
History of United States antitrust law
History_of_United_States_antitrust_law
1976 American law
in state court. California v. ARC America Corp., 490 U.S. 93 (1989). 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). See Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., 134 S.
Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
Hart–Scott–Rodino_Antitrust_Improvements_Act
Historical practice of selling multiple films to a theater as a unit
was ruled unlawful by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. (1948). Under block booking, "independent ('unaffiliated')
Block_booking
1992 United States Supreme Court case
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992), is a 1992 Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that even though an equipment
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
Eastman_Kodak_Co._v._Image_Technical_Services,_Inc.
US federal regulatory agency (1887–1996)
Women In Military Service For America Memorial Foundation Sarah Keys v. Carolina Coach Company, 64 MCC 769 (1955). Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960)
Interstate Commerce Commission
Interstate_Commerce_Commission
Private antitrust lawsuit
AMD v. Intel was a private antitrust lawsuit, filed in the United States by Advanced Micro Devices ("AMD") against Intel Corporation in June 2005. It
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.
Advanced_Micro_Devices,_Inc._v._Intel_Corp.
1936 US law prohibiting price discrimination
Court unanimously affirmed this decision in 1990. In 1994, the American Booksellers Association and independent bookstores filed a federal complaint in New
Robinson–Patman_Act
1895 United States Supreme Court case
the American Sugar Refining Company gained control of the E. C. Knight Company and several others, which resulted in a 98% monopoly of the American sugar
United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
United_States_v._E._C._Knight_Co.
US antitrust case concerning price fixing of e-books
United States v. Apple Inc., 952 F. Supp. 2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), was a US antitrust case in which the Court held that Apple Inc. conspired to raise the
United_States_v._Apple_(2012)
1972 United States Supreme Court case
Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Trading Stamp Co., 405 U.S. 233 (1972), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that
FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Trading Stamp Co.
FTC_v._Sperry_&_Hutchinson_Trading_Stamp_Co.
United States federal antitrust broadcasting law
Radovich v. National Football League in 1957, rejecting the NFL's claim to the same antitrust exemption as baseball. In 1960, the rival American Football
Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961
Sports_Broadcasting_Act_of_1961
1912 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association, 224 U.S. 383 (1912), is the first case in which the United States Supreme Court held it a violation of
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association
United_States_v._Terminal_Railroad_Association
American antitrust case
Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated was a noted American antitrust case, in which the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) accused Qualcomm's
FTC_v._Qualcomm
American legal case
led to its domination of the American market. Future Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan criticized United States v. Alcoa as a young man in 1966
United_States_v._Alcoa
2018 United States Supreme Court case
Ohio v. American Express Co., 585 U.S. 529 (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the nature of antitrust law in relationship to two-sided
Ohio_v._American_Express_Co.
1985 United States Supreme Court case
incredulousness that his colleagues would require an American company to arbitrate a claim under American antitrust law before a panel of foreign arbitrators
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Mitsubishi_Motors_Corp._v._Soler_Chrysler-Plymouth,_Inc.
1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision on antitrust
Court decision in International Boxing Club v. United States. The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) is a private non-profit organization
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma
1899 United States Supreme Court case
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 211 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that for a restraint
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States
Addyston_Pipe_&_Steel_Co._v._United_States
Case in the development of free software
Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp., 467 F.3d 1104 (7th Cir. 2006), was a significant case in the development of free software. The case
Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp.
Wallace_v._International_Business_Machines_Corp.
United States federal law
in 1945 after the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association that the federal government could regulate insurance companies
McCarran–Ferguson_Act
1905 United States Supreme Court case
South American meat industry during the first global economy (1860–1930)". Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic
Swift_&_Co._v._United_States
United States congressional subcommittee
on May 16, 1912. The committee concluded that clearing house associations (associations created for the clearing of checks to and from individual banks)
Pujo_Committee
1945 United States Supreme Court case
equipment businesses from one another. Contreras explains that American Securit Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp. is a notable case because it is the first
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
Hartford-Empire_Co._v._United_States
1985 United States Supreme Court case
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case that decided whether a dominant firm's unilateral
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
Aspen_Skiing_Co._v._Aspen_Highlands_Skiing_Corp.
1982 United States Supreme Court case
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 U.S. 332 (1982), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving antitrust law. A society of doctors in Maricopa
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society
Arizona_v._Maricopa_County_Medical_Society
Improper use of patent rights
Antitrust and Intellectual Property, Address Before American Intellectual Property Law Association (Jan. 24, 2004). Pate. George G. Gordon, Analyzing IP
Patent_misuse
1908 United States Supreme Court case
since 1780 (see North American fur trade). Loewe's declaration sparked a strike and a boycott by the United Hatters of North America (UHU), which had organized
Loewe_v._Lawlor
United States federal law
transferred some powers from the ICC to the newly formed United States Railway Association, a government corporation, regarding the disposition of bankrupt railroads
Interstate Commerce Act of 1887
Interstate_Commerce_Act_of_1887
1949 United States Supreme Court case
337 U.S. at 301. In ' Fashion Originators' Guild v. FTC, 312 U.S. 457 (1940), the defendant "association of dress manufacturers . . . sold more than 60%
Standard Oil Co. v. United States (Standard Stations)
Standard_Oil_Co._v._United_States_(Standard_Stations)
2007 United States Supreme Court case
Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007), is a US antitrust case in which the United States Supreme Court overruled Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
Leegin_Creative_Leather_Products,_Inc._v._PSKS,_Inc.
1974 U.S. antitrust legislation
antitrust legislation passed in the United States in 1974. Submitted by John V. Tunney, the law has as its main point the court review of Justice Department
Tunney_Act
1960 United States Supreme Court case
at 37-38. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911). See Dr. Miles, 220 U.S. at 378. United States v. Schrader's Son, Inc
United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.
United_States_v._Parke,_Davis_&_Co.
"shall be open to the public as freely as are trials in open court." "165 F3d 952 United States v. Microsoft Corporation". 20 October 1998. p. 952. v t e
Publicity In Taking Evidence Act
Publicity_In_Taking_Evidence_Act
1971 United States Supreme Court case
text related to this article: Haywood v. National Basketball Association Haywood v. National Basketball Association, 401 U.S. 1204 (1971), was a U.S. Supreme
Haywood v. National Basketball Association
Haywood_v._National_Basketball_Association
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Supreme Court cases, volume 445 Text of California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980) is available from: CourtListener
California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
California_Retail_Liquor_Dealers_Ass'n_v._Midcal_Aluminum,_Inc.
1980 United States Supreme Court case
448 U.S. at 191-92. Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Dev. Corp., 283 U.S. 27 (1931). Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co., 302 U.S. 458 (1938). Leitch
Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.
Dawson_Chemical_Co._v._Rohm_&_Haas_Co.
1993 United States Supreme Court case
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764 (1993), was a controversial United States Supreme Court case which held that foreign companies
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California
Hartford_Fire_Insurance_Co._v._California
American anti-monopoly government bureau
Competition policy Competition regulator Federal Trade Commission United States v. Microsoft Corp. Werden, Gregory J. (2018). "Establishment of the Antitrust
United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division
United_States_Department_of_Justice_Antitrust_Division
1962 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Wise, 370 U.S. 405 (1962), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that corporate officers acting in their duties
United_States_v._Wise
2019 United States Supreme Court case
Apple Inc. v. Pepper, 587 U.S. ___ (2019) was a United States Supreme Court case related to antitrust laws related to third-party resellers. The case
Apple_Inc._v._Pepper
2021 U.S. executive order on antitrust
Executive Order 14036, titled Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy and sometimes referred to as the Executive Order on Competition
Executive_Order_14036
American legal doctrine
emphasized in particular the Court's decision in United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), which contains some language suggesting
Rule_of_reason
1904 United States Supreme Court case
Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 193 U.S. 197 (1904), was a case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in December 1903. The Court ruled 5-4 against
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States
United States v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., was a 2005 Third Circuit antitrust decision in the United States finding that Dentsply, a monopolist manufacturer-supplier
United States v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc.
United_States_v._Dentsply_Int'l,_Inc.
LePage's Inc. v. 3M, 324 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2003), is a 2003 en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upholding a jury
LePage's,_Inc._v._3M
1897 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association
United_States_v._Trans-Missouri_Freight_Association
1944 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sherman
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n
United_States_v._South-Eastern_Underwriters_Ass'n
Antitrust class action against De Beers
cases including Hopkins v. De Beers Centenary A.G., et al., No. CGC-04-432954, which commenced on July 24, 2004, and Sullivan v. DB Investments, No. 04-cv-02819
De_Beers_antitrust_litigation
United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 648 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1981), is a patent-antitrust case in which the United States unsuccessfully tried
United States v. Westinghouse Electric Co.
United_States_v._Westinghouse_Electric_Co.
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Television v. GTE Sylvania, 433 U.S. 36 (1977), was an antitrust decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It overturned United States v. Arnold
Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.
Continental_Television,_Inc._v._GTE_Sylvania,_Inc.
Anti-competitive business practice where a supplier limits the rights of the buyer
and Intrabrand Coordination" (PDF). Journal of the European Economic Association. 9 (4): 721–741. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01019.x. JSTOR 25836087
Exclusive_dealing
American judge (born 1939)
practice. She was the presiding judge in the second trial of Wilk v. American Medical Association (May/June 1987). Judicial Conference of the United States
Susan Christine O'Meara Getzendanner
Susan_Christine_O'Meara_Getzendanner
1953 United States Supreme Court case
FTC v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co., 344 U.S. 392 (1953), (the MPAS case) was a 1953 decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the
FTC v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co.
FTC_v._Motion_Picture_Advertising_Service_Co.
Princo Corp. v. ITC, 616 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2010) was a 2010 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, that sought to
Princo_Corp._v._ITC
United States law
v. AT&T (1982) Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League (1983) United States v. Syufy Enterprises (1990) Wilk v. American Medical Association (1990)
Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970
Newspaper_Preservation_Act_of_1970
Principle in US antitrust law
Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. and United Mine Workers v. Pennington. The Court later expanded on the doctrine in California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking
Noerr–Pennington_doctrine
1943 United States Supreme Court case
Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law. It held that actions taken by
Parker_v._Brown
1940 United States Supreme Court case
State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (1997). Even before Socony, resale price maintenance had been held illegal per se in Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park
United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
United_States_v._Socony-Vacuum_Oil_Co.
2015 United States Supreme Court case
Responsibility (2014); Robert Baker, Before Bioethics: A History of American Medical Ethics From the Colonial Period to the Bioethics Revolution (2013)
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC
North_Carolina_State_Board_of_Dental_Examiners_v._FTC
1945 United States Supreme Court case
Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945) was a ruling of the United States Supreme Court concerning both antitrust law and freedom of the
Associated Press v. United States
Associated_Press_v._United_States
U.S. competition rules
v. AT&T (1982) Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League (1983) United States v. Syufy Enterprises (1990) Wilk v. American Medical Association (1990)
Merger_guidelines
1966 United States Supreme Court case
original text related to this article: Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Company FTC v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597 (1966), is a 1966 decision of the
FTC_v._Dean_Foods_Co.
travel, tourism, insurance
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
Surname or Lastname
Scottish and northern English
Scottish and northern English : from the medieval personal name Will, a short form of William, or from some other medieval personal names with this first element, for example Wilbert or Willard.English : topographic name for someone who lived by a spring or stream, Middle English wille (from wiell(a), West Saxon form of Old English well(a) ‘spring’). The surname is found predominantly in the south and southwestern parts of the country.German : from a short form of any of the various Germanic personal names beginning with wil ‘will’, ‘desire’.
Girl/Female
Arabic
City of the Prophet. In Medina Mohammed began his campaign to establish Islam.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : metonymic occupational name for a silk merchant, from Middle English selk(e), silk(e) ‘silk’.English : from a medieval personal name, a back-formation from Silkin (see Sill).Irish (Galway) : Anglicized form (part translation) of Gaelic Ó SÃoda (see Sheedy).Americanized form (translation) of German and Jewish Seide or Seid.
Male
Welsh
Welsh form of Hebrew Miyka'el (English Michael), MEICAL means "who is like God?"Â
Boy/Male
American, Australian, British, Chinese, Christian, English, French, German, Swedish, Teutonic
Purposeful Peace; Will-helmet; Will; Desire; Bright; Famous
Surname or Lastname
North German
North German : from a Low German pet form of Wilhelm.English : variant spelling of Wilk.
Girl/Female
Arabic, Australian, British, Danish, English, Hebrew
City of the Prophet; In Medina Mohammad Began his Campaign to Establish Islam
Boy/Male
German American Teutonic English
Will-helmet. Famous Bearers: poet and playwright William Shakespeare (1564-1616) and William...
Male
English
Short form of English William, WILL means "will-helmet."
Surname or Lastname
English
English : patronymic from the personal name Wilk.
Girl/Female
American, British, English
Ancient Name for Britain
Male
English
Short form of Old English names beginning with Wil-, WIL means "will."
Surname or Lastname
English
English : from Middle English wild ‘wild’, ‘uncontrolled’ (Old English wilde), hence a nickname for a man of violent and undisciplined character, or a topographic name for someone who lived on a patch of overgrown uncultivated land.English : habitational name from a place named Wyld, as for example in Berkshire and Dorset, both named from Old English wil ‘trap’, ‘snare’.German and Jewish (Ashkenazic) : cognate of 1, from Middle High German wilde, wilt, German wild ‘wild’, also used in the sense ‘strange’, ‘foreign’, and therefore in some cases a nickname for an incomer.
Male
Native American
Native American Mapuche name AUCAMAN means "wild condor."
Male
Native American
Native American Hopi name TOHOPKA means "wild beast."
Female
Hebrew
(מֵיטַל) Hebrew name MEITAL means "dew drops."
Male
English
Short form of Middle English Wilfred, WILF means "desires peace."
Boy/Male
English
Peace/will.
Male
Hungarian
Hungarian form of Latin Gustavus, GUSZTÃV means "meditation staff."
Surname or Lastname
Hispanic (Mexican)
Hispanic (Mexican) : unexplained.English : unexplained.
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
WILK V-AMERICAN-MEDICAL-ASSOCIATION
superl.
Savage; uncivilized; not refined by culture; ferocious; rude; as, wild natives of Africa or America.
a.
A radical vessel. See under Radical, a.
a.
Of or relating to the Medici, a noted Italian family; as, the Medicean Venus.
n.
A leguminous plant of the genus Medicago. The black medic is the Medicago lupulina; the purple medic, or lucern, is M. sativa.
mexcal.
See Mescal.
a.
Of or pertaining to medicine; medical.
v. t.
To draw from the breasts or udder; to extract, as milk; as, to milk wholesome milk from healthy cows.
a.
Medical.
a.
Containing medicine; used in medicine; medicinal; as, the medical properties of a plant.
mexcal.
Alt. of Mexical
a.
Of or pertaining to Mexico or its people.
a.
Of, pertaining to, or having to do with, the art of healing disease, or the science of medicine; as, the medical profession; medical services; a medical dictionary; medical jurisprudence.
a.
Opposed to the Americans, their aims, or interests, or to the genius of American institutions.
a.
Middle; median; in, or in the region of, the mesial plane; internal; -- opposed to lateral.
n.
A radical quantity. See under Radical, a.
v. t.
To cause (the eyes) to wink.
n.
A native or inhabitant of Mexico.
n.
A native of America; -- originally applied to the aboriginal inhabitants, but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America, and especially to the citizens of the United States.
a.
Of or pertaining to America; as, the American continent: American Indians.
travel, tourism, insurance