Search references for REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS. Phrases containing REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
See searches and references containing REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS!REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
Publication of the development and standards for the Internet
A Request for Comments (RFC) is a publication in a series from the principal technical development and standards-setting bodies for the Internet, most
Request_for_Comments
List of humorous technical standards proposals
A Request for Comments (RFC), in the context of Internet governance, is a type of publication from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and the Internet
April Fools' Day Request for Comments
April_Fools'_Day_Request_for_Comments
Application layer protocol
developed, eventually becoming the public 1.0. Development of early HTTP Request for Comments (RFC) documents started a few years later in a coordinated effort
HTTP
status codes. Standardized codes are defined by IETF as documented in Request for Comments (RFC) publications and maintained by the IANA. Other, non-standard
List_of_HTTP_status_codes
Request for a quote to purchase products or services
internet Request for Comments – Publication of the development and standards for the Internet Request for information – Business process Request for proposal –
Request_for_quotation
This is a partial list of RFCs (request for comments memoranda). A Request for Comments (RFC) is a publication in a series from the principal technical
List_of_RFCs
Family of file formats associated with RFC 1421
format was first developed in the privacy-enhanced mail series of Request for Comments (RFCs): RFC 1421, RFC 1422, RFC 1423, and RFC 1424. These standards
Privacy-Enhanced_Mail
Cryptographic protocols for securing data in transit
necessary for the client to request that the server set up a TLS connection. One of the main ways of achieving this is to use a different port number for TLS
Transport_Layer_Security
Proposal to carry IP traffic by birds
released on April 1, 1990. It is one of several April Fools' Day Request for Comments. Waitzman described an improvement of his protocol in RFC 2549, IP
IP_over_Avian_Carriers
April Fool's joke about facetious communications protocol
communication protocol for controlling, monitoring, and diagnosing coffee pots. As part of Internet Engineering Task Force's Request for Comments, RFC 2324 is published
Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol
Hyper_Text_Coffee_Pot_Control_Protocol
Family of email-related file formats
(email) MH Message Handling System Hall, E., ed. (September 2005). "Request for Comments: 4155 – The application/mbox Media Type". Internet Engineering Task
Mbox
Lossless compression algorithm
the application/zstd Media Type. Internet Engineering Task Force Request for Comments. IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC8478. RFC 8478. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
Zstd
Identifier for file formats
official authority for the standardization and publication of these classifications. Media types were originally defined in Request for Comments RFC 2045 (MIME)
Media_type
American Internet Society advisory body
oversight and appeal, and the appointment of the Request for Comments (RFC) Editor. The IAB is also responsible for the management of the IETF protocol parameter
Internet_Architecture_Board
Type of DNS transaction
of a client–server transaction. The client requesting a zone transfer may be a secondary server requesting data from a primary server. The portion of
DNS_zone_transfer
Address on the World Wide Web
used to select dynamic content (a document, etc.) or to tailor it as requested (see also: CGI and PATH_INFO, etc.). Example: URI: "http://www.example
URL
Namespace identifier assigned by IANA
Force Best Current Practice (BCP) 35, Request for Comments (RFC) 7595, Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes (updated by RFC 8615, Well-Known
List_of_URI_schemes
Internet top-level domain for educational institutions
November 25, 2011. Cooper, A. & Postel, J. (June 1993). The US domain; Request for comments: 1480. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute, University
.edu
Abbreviation of "For Your information"
by the word). Among Internet Standards, FYIs are a subset of the Request for Comments (RFC) series. The FYI series of notes is designed to provide Internet
FYI
Framework for communication protocols used in IP networking
CITEREFHafnerLyon1998 (help) J. Reynolds; J. Postel (November 1987). THE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REFERENCE GUIDE. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1000. RFC
Internet_protocol_suite
Encoding for Unicode domain names
the LDH subset of ASCII favored by DNS. It is specified in IETF Request for Comments 3492. The RFC author, Adam Costello, is reported to have written:
Punycode
2020 text-generating language model
2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021. Comment Regarding Request for Comments on Intellectual Property Protection for Artificial Intelligence Innovation (PDF)
GPT-3
URI scheme for linking email addresses
and enter it into an email client. It was originally defined by Request for Comments (RFC) 1738 in December 1994, expanded by RFC 2368 in July 1998, and
Mailto
Computer connected to a network
client. The term Internet host or just host is used in a number of Request for Comments (RFC) documents that define the Internet and its predecessor, the
Host_(network)
17487/RFC1606. RFC 1606. Informational. This is an April Fools' Day Request for Comments. J. Postel, ed. (January 1980). INTERNET PROTOCOL - DARPA INTERNET
List_of_IP_version_numbers
Canadian computer security consultant
Overview of Best Email DNS-Based List (DNSBL) Operational Practices (Request for Comments). IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC6471. RFC 6471. Chris Lewis' Spam Thresholds
Chris_Lewis_(Usenet)
Open standard for authorization
The OAuth 1.0 protocol was published as RFC 5849, an informational Request for Comments, in April 2010. Since 31 August 2010, all third party Twitter applications
OAuth
Canadian cryptographer
Obsolete. Obsoleted by RFC 4210. RFC 2511 – "Internet X.509 Certificate Request Message Format," Obsolete. RFC 2560 – "X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure
Carlisle_Adams
Distributed file system protocol
defined in a series of Request for Comments i.e. RFCs, allowing anyone to implement the protocol. Sun used version 1 only for in-house experimental purposes
Network_File_System
Linked hypertext system on the Internet
the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) Request for Comments (RFC) documents published by the Internet Engineering Task Force
World_Wide_Web
Lossless compression algorithm
was designed by Phil Katz, for version 2 of his PKZIP archiving tool. Deflate was later specified in Request for Comments (RFC) 1951 (1996). Katz also
Deflate
Code to identify human languages
gsw-u-sd-chzh for Zürich German. It is used by computing standards such as HTTP, HTML, XML and PNG. IETF language tags were first defined in Request for comment 1766
IETF_language_tag
Conventions for capitalizing the word
use Internet Protocol or otherwise. The distinction is evident in Request for Comments documents from the early 1980s, when the transition from the ARPANET
Capitalization_of_Internet
Label that is assigned to a device connected to a computer network
has a maximum of 253 ASCII characters. The Internet standards (Request for Comments) for protocols specify that labels may contain only the ASCII letters
Hostname
Document published by the IETF
intended to be work-in-progress documents for work that is eventually to be published as a Request for Comments (RFC) and potentially leading to an Internet
Internet_Draft
Lossless compression algorithm
Format, Internet Engineering Task Force Request for Comments, Fremont, CA: IETF Trust. "W3C Receives Emmy Award for Standardizing Font Technology". 2022-06-01
Brotli
Means of improving the efficiency of TCP/IP networks
was defined by John Nagle while working for Ford Aerospace. It was published in 1984 as a Request for Comments (RFC) with title Congestion Control in IP/TCP
Nagle's_algorithm
Uniform address for services on a website
Resource Identifier for URL path prefixes that start with /.well-known/. They are implemented in webservers so that requests to the servers for well-known services
Well-known_URI
Streaming communications protocol
process of publishing it as a Request for Comments (RFC). As of December 2015, the authors of that document have requested the RFC Independent Stream Editor
HTTP_Live_Streaming
Method of negotiating credentials between web server and browser
request, reusing the server nonce value (the server only issues a new nonce for each "401" response) but providing a new client nonce (cnonce). For subsequent
Digest_access_authentication
Obsolete ARPANET network protocol
Retrieved 4 August 2022. J. Reynolds; J. Postel (November 1987). THE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REFERENCE GUIDE. Network Working Group. doi:10.17487/RFC1000. RFC
Network Control Protocol (ARPANET)
Network_Control_Protocol_(ARPANET)
Flexible mechanism for authenticating users
first proposed by Sun Microsystems in an Open Software Foundation Request for Comments (RFC) 86.0 dated October 1995. It was adopted as the authentication
Pluggable Authentication Module
Pluggable_Authentication_Module
Highest maturity level in the IETF standards track (STD series)
(IETF) standards track for Internet protocol specifications. Internet Standards are published as one or more Request for Comments (RFC) documents and are
Internet_Standard
Fictional IPv4 header field indicating malicious intent
April Fools' Day RFC from 2003, authored by Steve Bellovin. The Request for Comments recommended that the last remaining unused bit, the "Reserved Bit"
Evil_bit
Computer network management and monitoring protocol
protocol needed for taking steps towards large-scale deployment of the Internet and its commercialization. The first Request for Comments (RFCs) for SNMP, now
Simple Network Management Protocol
Simple_Network_Management_Protocol
Order for the implementation of safety measures on aircraft
by a Final Rule Final Rule and Request for Comments Emergency airworthiness directives – issued without time for comment. This is only used issued "when
Airworthiness_directive
Chinese proposal for an alternative Internet addressing scheme
Internet Protocol version number 9, and RFC 1606, an April Fools' Day Request for Comments that describes a fictional IPv9 protocol that featured a vast addressing
IPv9_(China)
Simple network protocols for the exchange of human-oriented status and user information
network protocols for the exchange of human-oriented status and user information. The Name/Finger protocol is based on Request for Comments document RFC 742
Finger_(protocol)
Placeholder term used in computer science
before real-world usage. For example, foo and bar are used in over 330 Internet Engineering Task Force Requests for Comments, the documents which define
Metasyntactic_variable
Web page archive (file) format
alternative for including separate elements such as images, style-sheets and scripts in-line when serving an HTML request or saving an HTML resource for offline
MHTML
IPv4 to IPv6 transition technology
working groups and discussions through the IETF Internet Drafts and Request for Comments processes to develop these transition technologies toward that goal
List of IPv6 transition mechanisms
List_of_IPv6_transition_mechanisms
Identifier that is unique among all used identifiers
Practice (BCP) For Your Information (FYI) Internet Draft (I-D) Internet Experiment Note (IEN) Internet Standard (STD) Request for Comments (RFC) RARE Technical
Unique_identifier
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
(IMAP). MIME is an Internet standard – specified in the following request for comments (RFC) publications: RFC 2045, RFC 2046, RFC 2047, RFC 4288, RFC 4289
MIME
Type of IP address
such attempts at standardizing this range have not resulted in a request for comments. Link-local address R. Hinden; B. Haberman (October 2005). Unique
Unique_local_address
American computer scientist and Internet pioneer (born 1944)
"Network Working Group" and the Request for Comments series. He served as chair of the board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Steve_Crocker
Networking protocol
computer establishing the session then sends over the connection a "Session Request" packet with the NetBIOS names of the application establishing the session
NetBIOS_over_TCP/IP
Text after the # in a resource URI
2014). URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/csv Media Type (RFC - Informational). Independent Submission Request for Comments. (Not endorsed by) the Internet
URI_fragment
Open internet standards organization
the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Liaison from the Request for Comments (RFC) editor The Gateway Algorithms and Data Structures (GADS) Task
Internet Engineering Task Force
Internet_Engineering_Task_Force
Principal protocol used to stream data across an IP network
handshake procedure. The server must be listening (passive open) for connection requests from clients before a connection is established. The three-way
Transmission_Control_Protocol
HTTP header field
set in stone by the time (May 1996) of its incorporation into the Request for Comments standards document RFC 1945 (which "reflects common usage of the
HTTP_referer
US government website
Treasury published a request for comments to inform their work on Treasury Retail Investment Manager (TRIM), a future replacement for TreasuryDirect that
TreasuryDirect
Network protocol
many NAT routers. The protocol was published as an informational Request for Comments (RFC) by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in RFC 6886.
NAT_Port_Mapping_Protocol
American IETF participant
Ned Freed (1959 – 22 May 2022) was an IETF participant and Request for Comments author who contributed to a significant number of Internet Protocol standards
Ned_Freed
Level of performance in engineering and information technology
Each document in this series is paired with the currently valid Request for Comments (RFC) document. BCP was introduced in RFC-1818. BCPs are document
Best_current_practice
Protocol to run DNS queries using TLS
never proposed to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) with a Request for Comments (RFC). DNSCurve Henderson, Karl; April, Tim; Livingood, Jason (2020-02-14)
DNS_over_TLS
XML file format
Format (ReqIF): Request for Comments (English) OMG: Requirements Interchange Format (ReqIF) Specification (English) Free ReqIF viewer for Windows (no installation
Requirements Interchange Format
Requirements_Interchange_Format
Data modeling language
The following Request for Comments (RFCs) define the YANG language and some basic extensions: RFC 6020: YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network
YANG
String used to identify a name of a web or internet resource
Berners-Lee's first Request for Comments that acknowledged the existence of URLs and URNs. Most importantly, it defined a formal syntax for Universal Resource
Uniform_Resource_Identifier
Email functionality
T.; Henderson, D. A. (1977). "Standard for the format of ARPA network text messages". IETF Request for Comments (RFC) Pages - Test. ISSN 2070-1721. Husted
Blind_carbon_copy
Topics referred to by the same term
the free dictionary. RFC may refer to: Request for Comments, a memorandum on Internet standards Request for change, change management Remote Function
RFC
Set of JSON communications profiles
allowed comments to be embedded if the first two characters of a given line were "//". This could not be used with standard JSON parsers if comments were
JSON_streaming
Text in computer source code that is generally ignored by a compiler/interpreter
parse comments to provide capabilities such as API document generation, static analysis, and version control integration. The syntax of comments varies
Comment (computer programming)
Comment_(computer_programming)
Domain at the highest level of the DNS hierarchy
behalf of the Internet Engineering Task Force for various purposes specified in the Request for Comments publications. Generic top-level domains (gTLD):
Top-level_domain
Network event logging system and protocol
and alert customers to problems. The Syslog protocol is defined by Request for Comments (RFC) documents published by the Internet Engineering Task Force
Syslog
It was specified in two Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments (RFC) specifications – RFC 2692 and RFC 2693 – from the IETF SPKI
Simple public-key infrastructure
Simple_public-key_infrastructure
Public notice
typically allows 60 days for public comment from any interested party and an additional 30 days for reply comments. Original comments may still be filed within
Notice_of_proposed_rulemaking
Communications protocol for message-oriented middleware
mailing list. The IETF XMPP working group has produced a series of Request for Comments (RFC) documents: RFC 3920 (superseded by RFC 6120) RFC 3921 (superseded
XMPP
Network that allows computers to share resources and communicate with each other
Interplanetary Internet. IP over Avian Carriers was a humorous April fool's Request for Comments, issued as RFC 1149. It was implemented in real life in 2001. The
Computer_network
Email with proof of receipt
established in 2005 and it uses protocols described in the RFC 6109 (Request for Comments 6109), which was drafted in order to make the protocols public to
Certified_email
Phrase describing refusal of commentary
speaker does not choose to say anything on the subject. It is not a request for the material to be considered off the record or otherwise kept confidential
No_comment
Container
Tribune 1994. "Plastic Buckets; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comments and Information". Consumer Product Safety Commission. 1994-07-08
Five-gallon_bucket
Communication protocol that allows connections between networks
This is an April Fools' Day Request for Comments. C. Partridge; F. Kastenholz (December 1994). Technical Criteria for Choosing IP The Next Generation
Internet_Protocol
Series of free software licenses
relevant precedents. In response to the Request for Comments (RFC) process for improving the licensing position for Raku, Kuhn's draft was extensively rewritten
Artistic_License
American computer scientist (1952–2015)
ISI. From 1987 to 2006, she served on the editorial team of the Request for Comments series, co-leading the RFC Editor function at the ISI from 1998 until
Joyce_K._Reynolds
Linux distribution
from the original on 2020-08-16. Retrieved 2020-08-28. "Nix RFCS (Request for Comments)". GitHub. 17 December 2021. "Release Announcements". Nixos.org.
NixOS
American computer scientist and Internet pioneer (1943–1998)
known principally for being the editor of the Request for Comment (RFC) document series, for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), and for administering the
Jon_Postel
Swedish software developer
member of the working groups for the HTTP/2 and QUIC network protocols, and contributed to several technical Requests for Comments (RFCs). In April 2023, he
Daniel_Stenberg
Unit of digital information
the use of byte might be ambiguous. It is frequently used in the Request for Comments (RFC) publications of the Internet Engineering Task Force to describe
Octet_(computing)
Extension to File Transfer Protocol (FTP) that adds security
HTTPS. The SSL protocol was eventually applied to FTP, with a draft Request for Comments (RFC) published in late 1996. An official IANA port was registered
FTPS
Web page in-line data scheme
for page saving. As of 2024[update], data URIs are fully supported by all major browsers. The syntax of data URIs is defined in Request for Comments (RFC)
Data_URI_scheme
System to identify resources on a network
1035 superseded the 1983 DNS specifications. Several additional Request for Comments have proposed extensions to the core DNS protocols. The domain name
Domain_Name_System
Global system of connected computer networks
architecture. The resulting contributions and standards are published as Request for Comments (RFC) documents on the IETF web site. The principal methods of networking
Internet
Day Request for Comments: Almost every year since 1989, the Internet Engineering Task Force has included an April Fool in their Request for Comments publication
List of April Fools' Day jokes
List_of_April_Fools'_Day_jokes
Shadow library search engine
describe the site as related to Sci-Hub and LibGen. In response to a request for comment by the Office on its 2023 List, the Association of American Publishers
Anna's_Archive
Message shown to computer users on login
"Multics Glossary -M-". A.K. Bhushan, "Scenarios for using ARPANET computers", Request for Comments 254, Network Working Group, IETF https://www.ietf
Message_of_the_day
Interconnecting different types of computer networks
and does not refer to it in any of the normative specifications in Request for Comments and Internet standards. Despite a similar appearance as a layered
Internetworking
Internet protocol
publications (Request for Comments) known as RFC 2407, RFC 2408 and RFC 2409: RFC 2407 defined the Internet IP Security Domain of Interpretation for ISAKMP.
Internet_Key_Exchange
Conflicts among Wikipedia editors
shifted over the years. For content disputes in English Wikipedia, as of 2024, editors most often resort to Requests for Comment, along with specialized
Disputes_on_Wikipedia
Type of decentralized and distributed network architecture
reaching back to principles stated in the first Request for Comments, RFC 1. Tim Berners-Lee's vision for the World Wide Web was close to a P2P network
Peer-to-peer
Technical standard
for Standardization (ISO), such as JPEG More broadly, the following technologies may be referred to as "web standards" as well: Request for Comments (RFC)
Web_standards
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
Boy/Male
Egyptian
A request.
Girl/Female
Indian
Request
Boy/Male
Indian, Sanskrit
Request
Girl/Female
Hindu, Indian
Please; Request
Girl/Female
Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Sanskrit, Telugu
Request; Prayer
Girl/Female
Hindu, Indian
Request
Boy/Male
Tamil
A request
Girl/Female
Australian, Hawaiian, Hebrew
Request
Girl/Female
Hindu, Indian
Request
Girl/Female
Bengali, Indian
Request
Girl/Female
Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada
Request
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian, Marathi, Sanskrit
Humble; Request
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian
Blessing; Request
Girl/Female
Hindu
Request, Desire
Boy/Male
Tamil
Request
Girl/Female
Tamil
Request, Desire
Girl/Female
Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Telugu
Prayer; Request
Boy/Male
African
request'.
Boy/Male
Hindu
Request
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian, Marathi
Request
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
Male
English
English variant spelling of Hebrew Abner, ABNUR means "father of light."
Male
Cornish
, the smith's son.
Girl/Female
Assamese, Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Marathi, Sindhi, Telugu
Power and Dignity of Indra
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian
Indra's Younger Brother
Boy/Male
English
From the south meadow.
Girl/Female
Hindu, Indian
Endless; Sharp
Biblical
their strength
Boy/Male
Muslim
Sword. Sword edge.
Girl/Female
Muslim
Cool and fresh breeze of morning
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian, Sanskrit, Traditional
Lovely; Beloved; Dear One; Red Colour
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR-COMMENTS
n.
Inquest; jury of inquest.
n.
That which is asked for or requested.
imp. & p. p.
of Request
n.
A state of being desired or held in such estimation as to be sought after or asked for; demand.
v. i.
To go on a quest; to make a search; to go in pursuit; to beg.
v. t.
To vest again with possession or office; as, to revest a magistrate with authority.
v. t.
To ask for (something); to express desire ffor; to solicit; as, to request his presence, or a favor.
p. pr. & vb. n.
of Request
n.
The quality of being importunate; pressing or pertinacious solicitation; urgent request; incessant or frequent application; troublesome pertinacity.
v. t.
To address with a request; to ask.
v. t.
To obtain by request or entreaty.
n.
Request; desire; solicitation.
n.
The act of asking for anything desired; expression of desire or demand; solicitation; prayer; petition; entreaty.
conj.
Because; by reason that; for that; indicating, in Old English, the reason of anything.
n.
Often to be met with; happening at short intervals; often repeated or occurring; as, frequent visits.
n.
Inquiry; quest; search.
n.
One who requests; a petitioner.
n.
A body of men assembled under authority of law to inquire into any matterm civil or criminal, particularly any case of violent or sudden death; a jury, particularly a coroner's jury. The grand jury is sometimes called the grand inquest. See under Grand.
n.
The act of bequeathing or leaving by will; as, a bequest of property by A. to B.
n.
Judicial inquiry; official examination, esp. before a jury; as, a coroner's inquest in case of a sudden death.