Search references for DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC. Phrases containing DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
See searches and references containing DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC!DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
1996 United States Supreme Court case
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v. Federal Communications Commission, 518 U.S. 727 (1996), was a 1996 United States Supreme Court
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCC
Denver_Area_Educational_Telecommunications_Consortium,_Inc._v._FCC
Non-commercial mass media where the general public can create content
others brought suit. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v. FCC, 95–124 (1996) held the law unconstitutional
Public-access_television
American lawyer
ISBN 978-1588520128. Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. F.C.C., 518 U.S. 727 (1996); Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. F.C.C., 512 U
James_Goodale
Distribution of television programming to customers for a subscription fee in the USA
local rightsholder of San Diego Padres baseball. Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC was instructed to develop a means for television providers
Multichannel television in the United States
Multichannel_television_in_the_United_States
2019 United States Supreme Court case
a split ruling in Denver Area Educ. Telecomms. Consortium, Inc. v. F.C.C. In the 1970s, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandated that cable
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
Manhattan_Community_Access_Corp._v._Halleck
2005 court case in Pennsylvania
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) was the first case brought in the United States federal courts testing a
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District
Commission (FCC) has reduced the bandwidth allocation for UHF three times since then. Channels 70 to 83 were cut for emergency and other telecommunications purposes
Television in the United States
Television_in_the_United_States
U.S. federal prosecutions, 1949–1958
Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Baltimore, Seattle, Detroit, St. Louis, Denver, Boston, Puerto Rico, and New Haven. The second-tier defendants had a difficult
Smith Act trials of Communist Party leaders
Smith_Act_trials_of_Communist_Party_leaders
Moore had done were to emphasize the Ten Commandments' historical and educational importance ... or their importance as a model code for good citizenship
Glassroth_v._Moore
1972 United States Supreme Court case
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning alleged discrimination
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
Board_of_Regents_of_State_Colleges_v._Roth
Superior Court of California case concerning the teaching of evolutionary biology
Segraves v. California was a 1981 Superior Court of California case concerning the teaching of evolutionary biology in public schools. Kelly Segraves
Segraves_v._California
2007, the US Supreme Court in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. ruled that issue ads may not be banned from the months preceding
Issue_advocacy_ads
1997 court case in Louisiana
the decision in Edwards v. Aguillard, were joined by 1991 George H. W. Bush appointee Clarence Thomas. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, a 2005
Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish Board of Education
Freiler_v._Tangipahoa_Parish_Board_of_Education
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 444 U.S. 620 (1980), was a case before the United States Supreme Court. A nonprofit environmental-protection
Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Village_of_Schaumburg_v._Citizens_for_a_Better_Environment
American radio network (1927–1945)
mark a break with the past. In December 1944, the FCC approved the transfer of The Blue Network, Inc.'s broadcast licenses to American Broadcasting Company
Blue_Network
Legal case
the United States' decision of Walz v. Tax Commission, quoting The course of constitutional neutrality in this area cannot be an absolutely straight line
Aronow_v._United_States
Television station in Chicago
run, The Bozo Super Sunday Show incorporated segments compliant with FCC educational programming requirements. Charlando (transl. Chatting), a Spanish-language
WGN-TV
2004 United States court case
violation of the Establishment Clause (notably Edwards v. Aguillard, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District). Those cases followed an earlier constitutional
Selman v. Cobb County School District
Selman_v._Cobb_County_School_District
1970 United States Supreme Court case
Schacht v. United States, 398 U.S. 58 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court case, which ruled that actors could wear accurate military uniforms—regardless
Schacht_v._United_States
1921 United States Supreme Court case
Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the United States Constitution did not
Newberry_v._United_States
1961 United States Supreme Court case
Wikisource has original text related to this article: Scales v. United States (367 U.S. 203) Scales v. United States, 367 U.S. 203 (1961), was a 1960 decision
Scales_v._United_States
1890 Wisconsin Supreme Court case about religious instruction in public schools
State ex rel. Weiss v. District Board, 76 Wis. 177 (1890), popularly known as the Edgerton Bible case, was an important court case involving religious
Edgerton_Bible_Case
1984 United States Supreme Court case
political constituencies defined along religious lines. E.g., Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc., 459 U. S. 116 (1982). The second and more direct infringement
Lynch_v._Donnelly
1952 Supreme Court of the United States case on freedom of speech
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1952), was a United States Supreme Court case which determined that the Alien Registration Act of 1940's authorization
Harisiades_v._Shaughnessy
1804 criminal libel case
such as New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, Associated Press v. Walker and Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., it afforded the media
People_v._Croswell
American broadcast television network
television providers imposed by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to protect rights held by domestically based networks
American_Broadcasting_Company
Antipornography judgment
American Booksellers Ass'n v. Hudnut, 771 F.2d 323 (7th Cir. 1985), aff'd mem., 475 U.S. 1001 (1986), was a 1985 court case that successfully challenged
American Booksellers Ass'n v. Hudnut
American_Booksellers_Ass'n_v._Hudnut
1961 United States Supreme Court case
Wikisource has original text related to this article: Noto v. United States (367 U.S. 290) Noto v. United States, 367 U.S. 290 (1961), was a 1961 United States
Noto_v._United_States
Appellate case decided in 2009
United States v. Kilbride, 584 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2009) is a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejecting an appeal from
United_States_v._Kilbride
Criminal case in California (1987–1988)
People v. Freeman was a criminal prosecution of Harold Freeman, a producer and director of pornographic films, by the U.S. state of California. Freeman
People_v._Freeman
1973 United States Supreme Court case
based on obscenity charges. This precedent was cited in New York v. P. J. Video, Inc., 475 U.S. 868 (1986), another obscenity case in which films were
Heller_v._New_York
1943 United States Supreme Court case
319 Jones v. Opelika Murdock v. Pennsylvania Busey v. District of Columbia, 319 U.S. 579 (1943). Barber, Hollis W. (1947). "Religious Liberty v. Police
Busey_v._District_of_Columbia
United States federal court case
American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. Schundler, 168 F.3d 92 (3rd Cir. 1999), is a United States federal case establishing standards for a
American Civil Liberties Union v. Schundler
American_Civil_Liberties_Union_v._Schundler
1969 US Supreme Court flag-burning case
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Street v. New York Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court
Street_v._New_York
1948 United States Supreme Court case
original text related to this article: United States v. Congress of Industrial Organizations United States v. Congress of Industrial Organizations, 335 U.S
United States v. Congress of Industrial Organizations
United_States_v._Congress_of_Industrial_Organizations
Religious freedom case heard before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
C. H. v. Oliva, 226 F.3d 198 (3d Cir. 2000), was a religious freedom case in which mother Carol Hood sued Grace Oliva, her son Zachary's first grade teacher
C._H._v._Oliva
2011 US legal case concerning online defamation
First Amendment touchstones." Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. Implode-Explode Heavy Industries, Inc. (N.H., 2010) Curtis Cartier (December 6, 2011). "Crystal
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox
Obsidian_Finance_Group,_LLC_v._Cox
1953 United States Supreme Court case
Wikisource has original text related to this article: Poulos v. New Hampshire Poulos v. New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395 (1953), was a case in which the Supreme
Poulos_v._New_Hampshire
American commercial broadcast television network
The FCC eventually decided to appeal the Second Circuit Court's finding. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and oral arguments in FCC v. Fox,
Fox_Broadcasting_Company
1917 federal district court case in First Amendment law
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten, 244 F. 535 (S.D.N.Y. 1917), was a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten
Masses_Publishing_Co._v._Patten
Judgment on Constitutional issue
Booksellers Found. for Free Expression v. Cordray, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-149(Oh. January 27, 2010). "Bookfriends, Inc. v. Taft, 223 F. Supp. 2d 932" (PDF)
American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland
American_Booksellers_Foundation_for_Free_Expression_v._Strickland
American legal case
Nitke v. Gonzalez, 413 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) was a United States District Court for the Southern District of New York case regarding obscene materials
Nitke_v._Gonzales
1947 United States Supreme Court case
Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission, 330 U.S. 127 (1947), is a 5-to-2 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Hatch
Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission
Oklahoma_v._United_States_Civil_Service_Commission
American broadcast television network
lineup being designed from the start to meet the earliest form of the FCC's educational programming guidelines under the Children's Television Act. NBA Inside
NBC
1953 United States Supreme Court case
Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389 (1953), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held there was no basis for denying a petitioner's
Dickinson_v._United_States
1930 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396 (1930), is a unanimous ruling by the US Supreme Court that the term "political purpose," as used in the Federal
United_States_v._Wurzbach
Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (6 July 2021). "The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc., v. United States Food and Drug Administration, Et Al" (PDF). Thomson
Timeline of disability rights in the United States
Timeline_of_disability_rights_in_the_United_States
Daniel v. Waters, 515 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1975) was a 1975 legal case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down Tennessee's
Daniel_v._Waters
Television station in San Diego
San Diego Instructional Television Authority, a consortium of 26 local school districts. The educational station in San Diego, KEBS-TV (channel 15), was
KNSD
1961 United States Supreme Court case
Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley, 366 U.S. 582 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that blue laws
Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley
Two_Guys_from_Harrison-Allentown,_Inc._v._McGinley
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC
DENVER AREA-EDUCATIONAL-TELECOMMUNICATIONS-CONSORTIUM-INC-V-FCC