Search references for BURSON V-FREEMAN. Phrases containing BURSON V-FREEMAN
See searches and references containing BURSON V-FREEMAN!BURSON V-FREEMAN
1992 United States Supreme Court case
Burson v. Freeman, 504 U.S. 191 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Tennessee law that restricted political
Burson_v._Freeman
2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court about campaign finance
Citizens_United_v._FEC
American lawyer
Supreme Court of the United States. One notable case he argued was Burson v. Freeman, which established a state's ability to regulate electioneering at
Charles_Burson
Criminal case in California (1987–1988)
People v. Freeman was a criminal prosecution of Harold Freeman, a producer and director of pornographic films, by the U.S. state of California. Freeman was
People_v._Freeman
2023 United States Supreme Court case
Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the line between true threats of violence punishable
Counterman_v._Colorado
Ban on political campaigning before or during election
unconstitutional, but upheld electoral silence. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Burson v. Freeman (1992) that campaigning can only be limited on election day in a small
Election_silence
2024 United States Supreme Court case
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, 602 U.S. 175 (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case resulting in a unanimous ruling that if Maria
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
National_Rifle_Association_of_America_v._Vullo
1964 United States Supreme Court case
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent
Jacobellis_v._Ohio
2022 United States Supreme Court case
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate, 596 U.S. 289 (2022), was a case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
FEC_v._Ted_Cruz_for_Senate
2025 United States Supreme Court case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, 606 U.S. 461 (2025), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case allowing states to require Internet pornography
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
Free_Speech_Coalition_v._Paxton
United States first amendment case
Murthy v. Missouri, 603 U.S. 43 (2024), originally filed as Missouri v. Biden, was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States involving the First
Murthy_v._Missouri
2022 United States Supreme Court case
Egbert v. Boule, 596 U.S. 482 (2022), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court declined to extend Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents.
Egbert_v._Boule
1989 U.S. Supreme Court case concerning free speech
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Texas v. Johnson Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme
Texas_v._Johnson
1977 United States Supreme Court case
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977), arising out of what is sometimes referred to as the Skokie Affair, is a
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie
1987 United States Supreme Court case
Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of two Missouri prison regulations. One of the
Turner_v._Safley
2005 court case in Pennsylvania
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) was the first case brought in the United States federal courts testing a
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District
contentious disputes within the Supreme Court. The doctrine was implied in Wooley v. Maynard in 1977 when the Supreme Court acknowledged a legitimate government
Government_speech
1964 United States Supreme Court case
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
1990 United States Supreme Court case
Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving a school district's ability to
Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens
Westside_Community_Board_of_Education_v._Mergens
1939 United States Supreme Court case
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939), is a US labor law case decided by the United States Supreme Court. In Jersey City
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization
Hague_v._Committee_for_Industrial_Organization
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Gonzalez v. Trevino, 602 U.S. 653 (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that plaintiffs alleging retaliatory arrest need
Gonzalez_v._Trevino
Speech or writing intended to incite hatred or violence
S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire. It held that "insulting or 'fighting words', those that by
Fighting_words
1982 US Supreme Court case that upheld criminalization of child pornography
New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982), is a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court, unanimously ruling that the First Amendment to the United States
New_York_v._Ferber
2025 U.S. Supreme Court decision
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, 604 U.S. 56 (2025), was a United States Supreme Court case brought by ByteDance Ltd. and TikTok challenging the constitutionality
TikTok,_Inc._v._Garland
2022 United States Supreme Court case
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 597 U.S. 507 (2022), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held, 6–3, that
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
Kennedy_v._Bremerton_School_District
2011 United States Supreme Court case
Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that speech made in a
Snyder_v._Phelps
1989 United States Supreme Court case
Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case. In an opinion by Justice Kennedy, the Court rejected a First
Ward_v._Rock_Against_Racism
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC and NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, 603 U.S. 707 (2024), were United States Supreme Court cases related to protected speech under the
Moody_v._NetChoice,_LLC
2003 United States Supreme Court case
Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that any state
Virginia_v._Black
1941 United States Supreme Court case
Cox v. New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569 (1941), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, although the government cannot regulate
Cox_v._New_Hampshire
Crime in the United States
Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444 (1969) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) Dennis v. United
Threatening the president of the United States
Threatening_the_president_of_the_United_States
1973 United States Supreme Court case
Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the First Amendment that reaffirmed and clarified the imminent
Hess_v._Indiana
2026 U.S. Supreme Court decision
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission (No. 24-621) was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC
National_Republican_Senatorial_Committee_v._FEC
1960 United States Supreme Court case
Wikisource has original text related to this article: Bates v. City of Little Rock (361 U.S. 516) Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case
Bates_v._City_of_Little_Rock
1971 U.S. Supreme Court case on freedom of speech and public civility
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Cohen v. California Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), is a landmark decision of the US
Cohen_v._California
1969 United States Supreme Court case
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Brandenburg_v._Ohio
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Lindke v. Freed, 601 U.S. 187 (2024), and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, 601 U.S. 205 (2024), were a pair of United States Supreme Court cases regarding
Lindke_v._Freed
2011 United States Supreme Court case
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 786 (2011), is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that struck down a 2005 California law
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
Brown_v._Entertainment_Merchants_Association
1974 U.S. Supreme Court case
Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114 (1889). Arnett, 178–80 Arnett, at 185 Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 (1971). North American Cold Storage Co. v. City
Arnett_v._Kennedy
1990 United States Supreme Court case
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Osborne_v._Ohio
2003 United States Supreme Court case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most
McConnell_v._FEC
1983 United States Supreme Court case
Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the First Amendment rights of public employees who speak on
Connick_v._Myers
1969 United States Supreme Court case
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that helped to establish an implied "right to privacy"
Stanley_v._Georgia
2021 United States Supreme Court case
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, 141 S.Ct. 2373 (2021), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the disclosure of donors to non-profit
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
Americans_for_Prosperity_Foundation_v._Bonta
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise
Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona
1995 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union, 513 U.S. 454 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Section 501(b)
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
United_States_v._National_Treasury_Employees_Union
2006 United States Supreme Court case
Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees
Garcetti_v._Ceballos
1976 United States Supreme Court case on campaign finance
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on campaign finance. A majority of justices held that, as provided
Buckley_v._Valeo
2008 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering"
United States v. Williams (2008)
United_States_v._Williams_(2008)
2018 United States Supreme Court case
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
National_Institute_of_Family_and_Life_Advocates_v._Becerra
1952 United States Supreme Court case
original text related to this article: Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952), also referred to as the Miracle
Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson
Joseph_Burstyn,_Inc._v._Wilson
2010 United States Supreme Court case
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010), was a case decided in June 2010 by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the Patriot
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Holder_v._Humanitarian_Law_Project
2007 U.S. Supreme Court case on student speech
Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators
Morse_v._Frederick
2018 United States Supreme Court case
in part, citing an earlier Supreme Court ruling in Burson v. Freeman 504 U.S. 191 (1992). In Burson, the Court upheld the constitutionality of a Tennessee
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
Minnesota_Voters_Alliance_v._Mansky
1919 United States Supreme Court case
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during
Schenck_v._United_States
1940 United States Supreme Court case
Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940), is a US labor law case of a United States Supreme Court. It reversed the conviction of the president of a local
Thornhill_v._Alabama
2002 United States Supreme Court case
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the First Amendment rights
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White
Republican_Party_of_Minnesota_v._White
1968 United States Supreme Court case
Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot preemptively
Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne
Carroll_v._Town_of_Princess_Anne
2015 United States Supreme Court case
Elonis v. United States, 575 U.S. 723 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether conviction of threatening another person over
Elonis_v._United_States
1998 United States Supreme Court case
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the National Foundation
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
National_Endowment_for_the_Arts_v._Finley
2014 United States Supreme Court case
Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. 616 (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois state law that allowed
Harris_v._Quinn
1963 United States Supreme Court case
Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963), is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the
Edwards_v._South_Carolina
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, 431 U.S. 85 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States found that an ordinance
Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro
Linmark_Associates,_Inc._v._Township_of_Willingboro
Arrest or prosecution done to punish the exercising of civil rights
the courts, which may include stays of proceedings or damages. In Fleming v. Ontario (2019), the Supreme Court of Canada addressed the issue of preventive
Retaliatory arrest and prosecution
Retaliatory_arrest_and_prosecution
1996 United States Supreme Court case
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC, 518 U.S. 604 (1996), was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Colorado Republican
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC
Colorado_Republican_Federal_Campaign_Committee_v._FEC
1978 United States Supreme Court case
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978), is a U.S. constitutional law case which defined the free speech right of corporations
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
First_National_Bank_of_Boston_v._Bellotti
1973 U.S. Supreme Court case on obscenity
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity. The ruling was
Miller_v._California
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._Robins
1927 United States Supreme Court case
Fiske v. Kansas, 274 U.S. 380 (1927), was a United States Supreme Court Case that was first argued May 3, 1926 and finally decided May 16, 1927. The case
Fiske_v._Kansas
1942 United States Supreme Court case
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court articulated the
Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire
1915 United States Supreme Court case
Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling by a 9–0 vote that
Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Mutual_Film_Corp._v._Industrial_Commission_of_Ohio
1969 United States Supreme Court case
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that recognized
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that New Hampshire could not constitutionally
Wooley_v._Maynard
2011 United States Supreme Court case
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute that restricted
Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc.
1975 United States Supreme Court case
Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975), was a United States Supreme Court decision that established First Amendment protection for commercial speech
Bigelow_v._Virginia
Criterion set forth by the United States Supreme Court
set forth by the United States Supreme Court, in the leading case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). The
Substantial_disruption
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Vidal v. Elster, 602 U.S. 286, is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with 15 U.S.C. § 1052, a provision of the Lanham Act regarding trademarks
Vidal_v._Elster
1991 United States Supreme Court case
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the First Amendment and the ability of
Barnes_v._Glen_Theatre,_Inc.
1997 United States Supreme Court case
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
1971 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363 (1971), is a United States Supreme Court decision in an in rem case on procedures following the
United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs
United_States_v._Thirty-seven_Photographs
1931 United States Supreme Court case
Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 7–2, that a California
Stromberg_v._California
Contributions to American election campaign funds
assert that following a number of Supreme Court decisions — Citizens United v. FEC (2010) in particular—the "very wealthy" are now allowed to spend unlimited
Campaign finance in the United States
Campaign_finance_in_the_United_States
2022 United States Supreme Court case
Shurtleff v. City of Boston, 596 U.S. 243 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Shurtleff_v._City_of_Boston
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 557 (1980), was an important case decided by the United States Supreme Court
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Central_Hudson_Gas_&_Electric_Corp._v._Public_Service_Commission
1994 United States Supreme Court case
sodomy. After Northern District of Georgia senior judge Richard Cameron Freeman granted Bowers summary judgement on her First and Fourteenth Amendment
Waters_v._Churchill
1927 United States Supreme Court case
Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927), was a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of an individual who had engaged in speech
Whitney_v._California
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), was a US labor law case where the United States Supreme Court upheld the maintaining of a union
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
Abood_v._Detroit_Board_of_Education
1943 United States Supreme Court case
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door
Murdock_v._Pennsylvania
2003 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003), was a decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the United States
United States v. American Library Ass'n
United_States_v._American_Library_Ass'n
2023 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Hansen, 599 U.S. 762 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case about whether a federal law that criminalizes encouraging or inducing
United_States_v._Hansen
2000 United States Supreme Court case
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision regarding the First Amendment. The Court ruled 6–3 that the right to
Hill_v._Colorado
1943 United States Supreme Court case
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
West_Virginia_State_Board_of_Education_v._Barnette
2014 United States Supreme Court case
Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving public employee's freedom of speech rights. Edward Lane sued Steve Franks
Lane_v._Franks
2006 United States Supreme Court case
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a Vermont law which placed a cap on financial
Randall_v._Sorrell
1972 United States Supreme Court case
Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court decision affecting educational case law involving tenure and due process.
Perry_v._Sindermann
1966 United States Supreme Court case
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Brown v. Louisiana Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court
Brown_v._Louisiana
2015 United States Supreme Court case
Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, 576 U.S. 200 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that license
Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans
Walker_v._Texas_Division,_Sons_of_Confederate_Veterans
2014 United States Supreme Court case
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 573 U.S. 149 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case. In the 2010 campaign, Susan B. Anthony List purchased billboard
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Susan_B._Anthony_List_v._Driehaus
1968 United States Supreme Court case
Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the absence of proof of
Pickering v. Board of Education
Pickering_v._Board_of_Education
1957 U.S. Supreme Court case
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v. California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United
Roth_v._United_States
BURSON V-FREEMAN
BURSON V-FREEMAN
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant spelling of Curzon.
Boy/Male
French
Little bear.
Male
English
English surname transferred to forename use, BENSON means "son of Ben."
Surname or Lastname
English
English : unexplained; apparently a patronymic, but from an unidentified medieval personal name. It may be a variant of Barson. On the other hand, there appears to be a French connection with the villages of Hardanges and La Chapelle au Riboul, whence bearers of this name are recorded as having emigrated to Canada.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : habitational name from a place name that is very common in central and northern England. The derivation in most cases is from Old English burh ‘fort’ (see Burke) + tūn ‘enclosure’, ‘settlement’.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : unexplained. It may be a variant of Balson (see Balsam) or Bulson.
Male
Hungarian
Hungarian form of Latin Gustavus, GUSZTÃV means "meditation staff."
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant spelling of Burgin.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant of Burton.
Boy/Male
Sikh
Agree in anything
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant spelling of Burden.Polish : nickname for a troublemaker (see Burda).
Surname or Lastname
English
English : patronymic from a short form of Bartholomew.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : unexplained; most probably a patronymic from an unidentified medieval personal name, but compare Balson and Bolson.
Boy/Male
Shakespearean
King Henry V' Duke of Bourbon.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : habitational name from any of various places called Burston, in Buckinghamshire, Norfolk, and Staffordshire, which have different origins. The Buckinghamshire place name is from an Old English personal name Briddel + Old English þorn ‘thorn tree’; the place in Norfolk is named with Old English byrst ‘rough ground’, ‘landslip’ + tÅ«n ‘farmstead’; the Staffordshire place name has the same second element, the first being an Old English personal name Burgwine or Burgwulf.English : possibly from an unrecorded Old English personal name, BurgstÄn.Jewish (American) : Americanized spelling of Burstein (see Bernstein).
Boy/Male
English American
From the fortified town.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : unexplained; either a patronymic from Buck, or possibly an altered form of Buxton.
Surname or Lastname
English (chiefly West Country)
English (chiefly West Country) : (of Norman origin) from the Old French personal name Burdo (oblique case Burdon), probably of Germanic origin, but uncertain meaning.English (chiefly West Country) : nickname for a pilgrim or one who carried a pilgrim’s staff, Middle English, Old French bourdon.English (chiefly West Country) : habitational name from any of various places called Burdon or Burden. Burden in West Yorkshire and Great Burdon in County Durham are named with Old English burh ‘stronghold’, ‘fortified place’ + dūn ‘hill’; Burdon in Tyne and Wear is named with Old English b̄re ‘byre’ + denu ‘valley’.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : patronymic from Butt 2.
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant spelling of Burgin.
BURSON V-FREEMAN
BURSON V-FREEMAN
Boy/Male
Biblical
Merciful, compassionate.
Male
Vietnamese
Vietnamese name HIEU means "dutiful to parents."
Boy/Male
Arabic, Muslim
Sina was the Father of Abu Ali Ib-e-sina
Boy/Male
Sikh
Imbued in the lords absorption, One imbued by naam
Boy/Male
Australian, Irish
Surname
Girl/Female
Biblical
Containing ten cities.
Girl/Female
Tamil
Dusky, Mother of Hanuman (Mother of Hanuman)
Surname or Lastname
English
English : habitational name from either of the places called Washington, in Tyne and Wear and West Sussex. The latter is from Old English WassingatÅ«n ‘settlement (Old English tÅ«n) of the people of Wassa’, a personal name that is probably a short form of some compound name such as WÄðsige, composed of the elements wÄð ‘hunt’ + sige ‘victory’. Washington in Tyne and Wear is from Old English WassingtÅ«n ‘settlement associated with Wassa’.George Washington (1732–99), 1st president of the U.S. (1789–97), was born at Bridges Creek, VA. His great-grandfather had settled in the colony after emigrating from England in 1658. With the passage of time, the surname has come to be borne by more African Americans than English Americans. A prominent example was the educator Booker T. Washington (1856–1915), born a slave in VA, who adopted his surname from his stepfather, Washington Ferguson.
Girl/Female
Tamil
Baijanti | பைஜஂதீ / வைஜஂதீ
Name of a flower
Girl/Female
Assamese, Bengali, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Sanskrit, Sindhi, Telugu
Soft; Delicate; Smooth; Tender
BURSON V-FREEMAN
BURSON V-FREEMAN
BURSON V-FREEMAN
BURSON V-FREEMAN
BURSON V-FREEMAN
v. t.
To represent as a person; to personify; to impersonate.
v. i.
See Butt, v., and Abut, v.
pl.
of Bursa
v. i.
See Merrymake, v.
n.
Same as Bunyon.
n.
A large, unwieldy person.
v. t.
See Roust, v. t.
n.
A parson; the parish priest.
v. & n.
See Scent, v. & n.
a.
Of or pertaining to a bursa or to bursae.
v. i.
To be fastened by a button or buttons; as, the coat will not button.
v. t. & i.
See Avale, v.
v. t.
To oppress with anything grievous or trying; to overload; as, to burden a nation with taxes.
n.
Alt. of Bunion
n. & v.
Murder, n. & v.
v. t.
To impose, as a load or burden; to lay or place as a burden (something heavy or objectionable).