AI & ChatGPT searches , social queriess for COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
Search references for COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE. Phrases containing COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
See searches and references containing COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE!
Search references for COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE. Phrases containing COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
See searches and references containing COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE!COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
Clause within the United States Constitution
The Compulsory Process Clause within the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution lets criminal case defendants attain witnesses in their favor
Compulsory_Process_Clause
1791 amendment enumerating rights related to criminal prosecutions
Confrontation Clause gives criminal defendants the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, while the Compulsory Process Clause gives criminal
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Self-Incrimination Clause Takings Clause Grand Jury Clause Assistance of Counsel Clause Compulsory Process Clause Confrontation Clause Impartial Jury Clause Information
List of clauses of the United States Constitution
List_of_clauses_of_the_United_States_Constitution
1982 United States Supreme Court case
to dismiss the indictment under the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court
United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
United_States_v._Valenzuela-Bernal
comprise a substantial portion of the Supreme Court's docket. See #Jury Clauses Ex parte Bollman, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 75, 135–37 (1807) United States v.
List of United States Supreme Court cases involving constitutional criminal procedure
List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_constitutional_criminal_procedure
1967 United States Supreme Court case
States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided that the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution (guaranteeing the right
Washington_v._Texas
1963 United States Supreme Court case
Constitution, binding on the states, and essential for a fair trial and due process of law regardless of the circumstances of the case. For the Court, Justice
Gideon_v._Wainwright
Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
Confrontation_Clause
Latin for "for oneself"
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Pro se legal representation in the United States
Pro_se_legal_representation_in_the_United_States
1988 United States Supreme Court case
recognized in Washington v. Texas (1967). Taylor was the first Compulsory Process Clause case since Washington v. Texas to provide a specific limitation
Taylor_v._Illinois
1879 United States Supreme Court case
protection of religious liberties, impartial juries and the Confrontation Clauses of the Sixth Amendment. George Reynolds was a member of the Church of Jesus
Reynolds_v._United_States
1984 United States Supreme Court case
purpose to protect the right to a fair trial guaranteed by the Due Process Clause: The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether
Strickland_v._Washington
Portion of the sixth amendment to the US Constitution
The Vicinage Clause is a provision in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution regulating the vicinity from which a jury pool may be selected
Vicinage_Clause
1791 amendment enumerating due process rights
the Double Jeopardy Clause; the Self Incrimination Clause; the Due Process Clause; and, the Takings Clause. The Grand Jury Clause limits governmental
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
American constitutional right
The Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
Assistance_of_Counsel_Clause
1977 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Brewer_v._Williams
2004 United States Supreme Court case
hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements
Crawford_v._Washington
Clause in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right
Speedy_Trial_Clause
Application of the U.S. Bill of Rights to states and their local governments
Due Process Clause and the Privileges or Immunities Clause. While the Fifth Amendment had included a due process clause, the due process clause of the
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights
1932 United States Supreme Court case
Bill of Rights. In effect, it held that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause included at least part of the right to counsel referred to in the Sixth
Powell_v._Alabama
1968 United States Supreme Court case
procedures to the requirements of the Federal Constitution. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that those procedures be fundamentally
Duncan_v._Louisiana
2016 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
McDonnell_v._United_States
Clause Compulsory Process Clause Assistance of Counsel Clause Eighth Amendment: Excessive Bail Clause Fourteenth Amendment: Due process clause Equal Protection
United States criminal procedure
United_States_criminal_procedure
enjoy the right . . . to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor . . . . The Compulsory Process Clause guarantees the defendant the
United States constitutional criminal procedure
United_States_constitutional_criminal_procedure
2010 United States Supreme Court case
civil in nature, deportation has been closely connected to the criminal process for nearly a century. Given the connection, it was difficult for the Court
Padilla_v._Kentucky
Conflict resolution in a tribunal before the people
hearings. The term "public trial" implied the purposeful presentation of the process to wide public. Public trials were usually widely discussed in media and
Public_trial
1975 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Faretta_v._California
1964 United States Supreme Court case
540 U.S. 519 (2004). Moulton v. Maine, 474 U.S. 159 (1989). The due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments provide another basis for challenging
Massiah_v._United_States
1970 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Illinois_v._Allen
Claim asserted by one party in response to the claim of another
fair to require him to assert any other which is compulsory within the meaning of Rule 13(a). Clause (2), added by amendment to Rule 13(a), carries out
Counterclaim
2000 United States Supreme Court case
hate-crimes laws. Due process procedural safeguards should apply equally to both of these punishments. Under the Constitution, due process gives criminal defendants
Apprendi_v._New_Jersey
2005 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
United_States_v._Booker
2006 United States Supreme Court case
defense", a right protected by both the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This right
Holmes_v._South_Carolina
United States Supreme Court case
right to a fair trial as required by the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In particular, the Court sought to determine
Sheppard_v._Maxwell
2006 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
United_States_v._Gonzalez-Lopez
Contract clause requiring parties to resolve disputes via arbitration
arbitration clause is a clause in a contract that requires the parties to resolve their disputes through an arbitration process. Although such a clause may or
Arbitration_clause
1959 United States Supreme Court case
due to the original trial depriving Irvin of Fourteenth Amendment due process. Justice Clark's majority opinion underscored the need for impartiality
Irvin_v._Dowd
2022 United States Supreme Court case
United States Supreme Court involving the application of Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In its decision
Hemphill_v._New_York
1942 United States Supreme Court case
unusual punishment") or Fourteenth Amendments ("Due Process" and "Equal Protection Clauses"). Compulsory sterilizations of the mentally disabled and mentally
Skinner_v._Oklahoma
2017 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Peña-Rodriguez_v._Colorado
1967 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Anders_v._California
2003 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Wiggins_v._Smith
2017 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Buck_v._Davis
2019 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Garza_v._Idaho
1942 United States Supreme Court case
reinforcement that such a case is not to be reckoned as denial of fundamental due process was overruled by Gideon v. Wainwright. In the dissent, Justice Hugo Black
Betts_v._Brady
1989 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
Blanton_v._City_of_North_Las_Vegas
1986 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Nix_v._Whiteside
2010 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Skilling_v._United_States
2019 United States Supreme Court case
prosecution occurred. In oral argument, Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed due process and jury rights concerns under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, respectively
United_States_v._Haymond
2002 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Ring_v._Arizona
1927 US Supreme Court sterilization case
"for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Despite
Buck_v._Bell
2011 United States Supreme Court case
test to determine whether statements are "testimonial" for Confrontation Clause purposes. In Bryant, the Court expanded upon the test first articulated
Michigan_v._Bryant
Sterilization effected by government coercion
Compulsory sterilization, also known as forced or coerced sterilization, refers to any government-mandated program to involuntarily sterilize a specific
Compulsory_sterilization
1972 United States Supreme Court case
or inability to try Manning under circumstances that comported with due process." Brooks, Brian P. (1994). "A New Speedy Trial Standard for Barker v Wingo:
Barker_v._Wingo
2009 United States Supreme Court case
trial. The Court drew a distinction between the Compulsory Process Clause and the Confrontation Clause. Even though Melendez-Diaz had the opportunity to
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Melendez-Diaz_v._Massachusetts
2013 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Alleyne_v._United_States
2012 United States Supreme Court case
plea bargain at the desire of the prosecutor. The Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that:
Lafler_v._Cooper
1972 United States Supreme Court case
jury in the Sixth Amendment, but that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause does not incorporate that right as applied to the states. This case
Apodaca_v._Oregon
1992 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Doggett_v._United_States
2008 United States Supreme Court case
could also be seen as a part of the traditional meaning of the Due Process Clause," Faretta had held that a state may not force a lawyer upon a defendant
Indiana_v._Edwards
1972 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Argersinger_v._Hamlin
Prohibits the U.S. Congress from establishing an official religion
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, together with that Amendment's Free Exercise Clause, form the constitutional
Establishment_Clause
US bill
Sixth Amendment, namely the Information Clause, the Assistance of Counsel Clause, and the Compulsory Process Clause. The Sixth Amendment (and the remainder
Crimes_Act_of_1790
2011 United States Supreme Court case
Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), is a significant 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court. On June 23, 2011, the Supreme
Bullcoming_v._New_Mexico
1969 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Frazier_v._Cupp
Compulsory sterilization of disabled people in the U.S. prison system was permitted in the United States from 1907 to the 1960s, during which approximately
Compulsory sterilization of disabled people in the U.S. prison system
Compulsory_sterilization_of_disabled_people_in_the_U.S._prison_system
Portion of the US Constitution regarding states
Extradition Clause to require the extradition of fugitives. The Fugitive Slave Clause requires the return of fugitive slaves; this clause was rendered
Article Four of the United States Constitution
Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution
1990 United States Supreme Court case
Sixth Amendment. The Court held that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, which provides criminal defendants with the right to confront witnesses
Maryland_v._Craig
Legal nonconsensual paid copyright or patent use
A compulsory license provides that the owner of a patent or copyright licenses the use of their rights against payment either set by law or determined
Compulsory_license
2006 United States Supreme Court case
Confrontation Clause purposes. Two years prior to its publication, in Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause bars “admission
Davis_v._Washington
Financial process by which a company is ended
the duties or drawback accruing on an entry. Liquidation may either be compulsory (sometimes referred to as a creditors' liquidation or receivership following
Liquidation
method of compulsory purchase was viewed as a repetitive and time-consuming process and the United Kingdom parliament enacted the Lands Clauses Consolidation
Compulsory purchase laws in Scotland
Compulsory_purchase_laws_in_Scotland
1988 United States Supreme Court case
was a 1988 United States Supreme Court case concerning the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court held
Coy_v._Iowa
1960 United States Supreme Court case
Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause. Under Due Process Clause
Flemming_v._Nestor
1979 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Scott_v._Illinois
1985 United States Supreme Court case
trial court had unconstitutionally hand-picked a jury during the voir dire process. This was because certain people were excused from the jury because they
Wainwright_v._Witt
1942 United States Supreme Court case
the first Supreme Court decision to hold that the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment required the reversal of a criminal defendant's conviction
Glasser_v._United_States
1980 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Adams_v._Texas
Compulsory enrollment into national or military service
known as the draft in American English, is the practice in which the compulsory enlistment in a national service, mainly a military service, is enforced
Conscription
1979 United States Supreme Court case
Amendment right to trial by jury as applied to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Justice Rehnquist cited Ballew v. Georgia
Burch_v._Louisiana
Legal measure
Democratic Party proposed a constitutional amendment to make sunset clauses compulsory in all legislation that lacks the support of a 75% parliamentary supermajority
Sunset_provision
1938 United States Supreme Court case
state jurisdiction. Assistance of counsel was held to be requisite to due process of law in state felony proceedings with the Gideon v. Wainwright decision
Johnson_v._Zerbst
2007 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Cunningham_v._California
Permits eminent domain
the Constitution— (a) for clause (2), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:— "(2) No property shall be compulsorily acquired or requisitioned
Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India
Twenty-fifth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_India
1968 United States Supreme Court case
unconstitutional bias towards capital punishment and deprived Witherspoon of due process. Writing for the majority, Justice Potter Stewart wrote: Whatever else
Witherspoon_v._Illinois
1987 United States Supreme Court case
Marshall, Powell, Stevens Dissent Rehnquist, joined by White, O'Connor, Scalia Laws applied Due Process Clause, Compulsory Process Clause, Fifth Amendment
Rock_v._Arkansas
1994 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Nichols v. United States (1994)
Nichols_v._United_States_(1994)
2000 United States Supreme Court case
argument. The counsel for the appellant, Ronald Maines, argued that due process coupled with the decision in Faretta required the extension of a constitutional
Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District
Martinez_v._Court_of_Appeal_of_California,_Fourth_Appellate_District
1925 United States Supreme Court case
public school. The decision significantly expanded coverage of the Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to recognize
Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters
Insurance for road vehicles
were relatively fast and dangerous by that stage, yet there was still no compulsory form of car insurance anywhere in the world. This meant that injured victims
Vehicle_insurance
appointment is often affirmed by the governor. The Constitution, in Article VI, clause (paragraph) 3, does state that "no religious Test shall ever be required
Voting rights in the United States
Voting_rights_in_the_United_States
1967 United States Supreme Court case
constitutes coercion and violates the Fourteenth Amendment Right due process clause as well as Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. Their
Garrity_v._New_Jersey
1974 United States Supreme Court case
the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause or the Sixth Amendment's Assistance of Counsel Clause. The statute required convicted defendants who
Fuller_v._Oregon
2012 United States Supreme Court case
third-party lab analyst does not violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause as long as the results were not directed to prove guilt. WILLIAMS v. ILLINOIS
Williams_v._Illinois_(2012)
1986 United States Supreme Court case
defendants; it assures the fairness, and thus the legitimacy, of our adversary process. The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional
Kimmelman_v._Morrison
2001 United States Supreme Court case
Compulsory Process Clause Washington v. Texas (1967) United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal (1982) Taylor v. Illinois (1988) Assistance of Counsel Clause
Glover_v._United_States
2002 United States Supreme Court case
years' probation. The Criminal Court of Appeals found that it was not compulsory to offer the defendant counsel for a suspended sentence because the sentence
Alabama_v._Shelton
Important decisions of US courts
Columbia violate the Equal Protection Clause as incorporated against the federal government by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Sarah Keys
List of landmark court decisions in the United States
List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
2008 United States Supreme Court case
the police was not testimonial and thus not barred by the confrontation clause. In his concurring opinion, Justice Alito questioned whether the statements
Giles_v._California
Article I, Section 8, clause 8. This clause is understood to grant Congress the power to enact copyright laws. The Copyright Clause forms the basis for
History of copyright law of the United States
History_of_copyright_law_of_the_United_States
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
Boy/Male
Hindu
Lord Vishnu, Prowess
Boy/Male
Indian, Sikh
Prowess
Girl/Female
Hindu, Indian
Prowess
Female
English
English name derived from the title, itself from Old French princesse, a feminine form of Prince, PRINCESS means "chief, first."
Surname or Lastname
English
English : variant of Priest.Jewish (Ashkenazic) : metonymic occupational name for someone who ironed clothes, from Yiddish pres ‘flat iron’.
Boy/Male
Tamil
Vikramendra | விகà¯à®°à®®à¯‡à®¨à¯à®¤à¯à®°
King of prowess
Vikramendra | விகà¯à®°à®®à¯‡à®¨à¯à®¤à¯à®°
Boy/Male
Hindu
Prowess
Boy/Male
Hindu
Bravery, Prowess, Valour
Girl/Female
American, Christian, English, Hindu, Indian, Marathi
Daughter of King
Biblical
judgment; process
Boy/Male
Greek Shakespearean
A sea god.
Boy/Male
Tamil
Prowess
Boy/Male
English, German, Gothic, Hindu, Indian, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Sikh, Telugu
Prowess
Boy/Male
Arabic, Australian, Muslim
Needed; Fitting; Compulsory
Girl/Female
Tamil
Pragya | பà¯à®°à®œà¯à®žà®¾
Lord Vishnu, Prowess
Pragya | பà¯à®°à®œà¯à®žà®¾
Boy/Male
Tamil
Amitbikram | அமிதபீகà¯à®°à®®Â
Limitless prowess
Amitbikram | அமிதபீகà¯à®°à®®Â
Girl/Female
Hindu
Lord Vishnu, Prowess
Boy/Male
Tamil
Bravery, Prowess, Valour
Boy/Male
Assamese, Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya, Telugu
Limitless Prowess
Boy/Male
Tamil
Praagya | பà¯à®°à®¾à®œà¯à®ž
Lord Vishnu, Prowess
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
Boy/Male
Tamil
Dandapaani | தாநà¯à®¤à®¾à®ªà®¾à®¨à¯€
An epithet for Yama
Male
Danish
, ever-living.
Surname or Lastname
English and Scottish
English and Scottish : variant spelling of Sherron.
Boy/Male
Australian, Gaelic, Irish
Hollow in the Hill
Boy/Male
Tamil
Ushakanta | உஷா காஂதா
The Sun
Boy/Male
Hindu, Indian
Rhythm
Female
Hebrew
(×œÖ´×‘Ö°× Ö·×ª) Variant form of Hebrew Livnah ("whiteness, transparency"), LIVNATH means "Belus, glass," from the sand of which glass was first made by the Phoenicians." In the bible, this is part of the name of a river, Shihor-libnath, which flows into the sea.
Boy/Male
Latin
Bean farmer.
Boy/Male
Tamil
Girl/Female
Gujarati, Hindu, Indian, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Sanskrit, Sindhi
Offering
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
COMPULSORY PROCESS-CLAUSE
a.
Tending to compel; compulsory.
a.
Serving to compel; compulsory.
n.
See Proceeds.
n.
The consort of a prince; as, the princess of Wales.
a.
Serving to compel or constrain; compulsory; restrictive.
n.
In actual space, as the progress of a ship, carriage, etc.
adv.
In a compulsory manner; by force or constraint.
a.
Having the power of compulsion; constraining.
v. t.
To make progress in; to pass through.
n.
In business of any kind; as, the progress of a negotiation; the progress of art.
v. i.
To make progress; to move forward in space; to continue onward in course; to proceed; to advance; to go on; as, railroads are progressing.
a.
Compulsatory.
n.
A series of actions, motions, or occurrences; progressive act or transaction; continuous operation; normal or actual course or procedure; regular proceeding; as, the process of vegetation or decomposition; a chemical process; processes of nature.
n. pl.
An order of large birds; the Ratitae; -- called also Proceri.
v. i.
To begin and carry on a legal process.
a.
Constraining; compulsory.
a.
Obligatory; enjoined by authority; necessary; due to compulsion.
n.
The act of proceeding; continued forward movement; procedure; progress; advance.
v. t.
To make a recess in; as, to recess a wall.